European Parliament debate: Investment of public money into animal cruelty
On 13 November 2013, the international animal welfare organisations Humane Society International (HSI), FOUR PAWS International and Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) will organise a debate in the European Parliament together with three Members of the European Parliament: Sidonia Jedrzejewska, Karin Kadenbach and Martin Häusling.
The event will focus on the use of public funds to finance agribusiness facilities in countries which fail to meet EU standards for farm animal welfare. This is an issue of tremendous importance to all stakeholders in farm animal production and welfare (both within and outside the EU), as well as in international development and finance. We are happy to see this issue being highlighted and hope you can join us for the discussion.
In order to register for the event, please send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org including your name, date of birth and address.
To read more on this topic:
Press release: International banks fund cruel farming practices banned in the EU
With financial backing of Member States in the European Union, international banks and credit agencies are investing in agricultural companies that fail to meet the EU’s standards for the humane treatment of farm animals. That is the conclusion of a report by international animal welfare organizations Humane Society International, Compassion in World Farming and FOUR PAWS. As a result, the organizations call for EU animal welfare standards to guide agricultural investment policies for EU-supported institutions.
In one example, the report finds China pig producer Muyuan Foodstuff received nearly US$30 million in investments while continuing to confine the majority of its breeding pigs in sow crates. Such intensive confinement systems prevent animals from fully stretching their limbs, let alone walking, nesting or experiencing other important natural behaviors.
In recent years, the EU has made progress in improving animal welfare standards, including prohibiting farmers in Member States from using intensive confinement systems such as barren battery cages for laying hens and sow crates to virtually immobilize breeding pigs for their entire pregnancies. This progress should be encouraged elsewhere, and certainly should not be undermined by EU investments.
Chetana Mirle, director of farm animal welfare for HSI, explained: “Money from EU citizens has no business winding up in the pockets of farmers who don’t meet EU standards for the treatment of animals. EU farm animal welfare policies were not enacted to merely push these unacceptable practices out of the EU, but to reduce animal suffering and answer consumer demands for farm animal welfare.”
Gabi Paun, director of campaigns with FOUR PAWS, said: “We uncovered support for facilities with poor animal welfare standards abroad and are asking investment institutions to adhere to EU farm animal welfare standards.”
Dil Peeling, director of campaigns at Compassion in World Farming, said: “When the EU has taken the democratic decision to curb the worst excesses of factory farming, but European money is used to drive animal misery elsewhere, those lending institutions involved fail the EU, its citizens and, most of all, the animals trapped in the systems they fund. These institutions need to change their policies now.”
Key elements of the report:
• Banks that provide financing for the purpose of development (also known as international finance institutions), such as the International Finance Corporation and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, were found to be investing in agribusiness companies outside the EU that confine animals in barren battery cages or sow crates. The companies included some of the largest in the world.
• Agribusiness companies engaging in intensive practices include the largest egg producer in Turkey, the largest poultry producer in the Ukraine, and some of the largest pig production companies in Ukraine and China.
• Despite EU concerns about how animals are treated on farms, these banks lack binding regulations relating to farm animal welfare.
• Export Credit Agencies of EU countries provide export insurance for equipment to companies that do not meet the EU’s farm animal welfare standards.
• Insurance guarantees underwritten by the German government support the export of animal confinement systems that do not meet either EU standards or Germany’s own animal welfare requirements. In the last four years, EUR40.86 million in credit insurance was granted by the country for the construction of cage systems to confine laying hens outside Germany. Yet, these systems are not permitted inside Germany itself.
A digital version of the report is available here.